Friday, 7 August 2009

Lembit misses the point...

Lembit Opik has wrote another one of his famous articles in the Daily Sport that is extremely derogatory towards woman, and not a newspaper that a politician should be writing in. Anyway, on the specifics of the article, which consists of patronising words to describe women to fit the theme of the newspaper, such as 'missus' 'lasses' and 'babe', he attempts to slight Harman's proposals for fairer representation of women in Parliament by saying that with her proposals, Jordon would be the ideal candidate for Home Secretary.

His article has a fundamental contradiction at the beginning too, when he actually says that men cannot be trusted. However, the thing that got me the most was with how he believed that Harriet Harman's proposals were about the "womanliest women available" getting the top jobs, which he believes Jordan epitomises. However, this is his own sexual conception, as Harman was arguing in terms of women's talent, not in terms of what women look like. Therefore, in other words, Opik believes that someone who sticks plastic in her boobs and runs as a contender in the 2001 General Election promising women free breast implants and more nudist beaches is someone who would constitute as being the top woman for a top job. A flawed conception of providing women more rights, if I do say so myself.

Criticising Harman for outlining credible ways of promoting women, Lembik Opic reinforces the male dominated culture of politics. He does rightly (except the derogatory use of the word 'lasses')say that

"Lots of lasses in Parliament are qualified to do these jobs and their talent should be recognised"
But the fundamental issue is that he has missed the whole point. Harman stated this quite clearly, that there are a lot of talented women in Parliament, but they are often overlooked. Opic basically says that if women had big boobs and were super models they would stand a better chance in politics. He has the wrong conception of talent, and what being a woman is.

Quite rightly the opposition have picked up on the story, with Henry Macrory, the Head of Press at the Conservative Party saying on Twitter:
"Massive snub to Huhne...Lembit Opik calls on Jordan to be made Home Secretary in his Daily Sport column today!"
And this all comes in the same week that the Lib Dem's made some progress in terms of tackling airbrushed images of women, which I commented on in a previous blog.

It makes you think there might be some hint of truth in his claims for Jordon to be the new Home Secretary, so watch out Jordan, be aware Katie Green...

7 comments:

Adam said...

I wish Lembit would stick to commenting on the dangers of asteroids, the persecution of the Baha'i faith in Iran and other issues rather than deliver drivel in the Daily Sport.

I never could quite believe that Lembit wrote a column in it, I doubt it's typical reading for the people of Montgomeryshire!

Adam

www.adamconnell.co.uk

JaneWatkinson said...

Thanks for the comment, I agree. Maybe we can try and find a box for him and only let him out occasionally.

Jane

burkesworks said...

Brilliant idea Jane. Just make sure that box is well soundproofed.

However - having had a look at Lembit's "columns" thanks to James Graham's handy "Prawn Free Lembit" aggregator, I get the feeling that the Honourable Member for Uranus doesn't actually have much input into them; the copy reads much more like the outpourings of some laddish hack from Essex rather than the Cheeky Boy himself. We all know Lembit talks rubbish - but not this kind of rubbish; it's out of character for him. A shame he continues to put his name to it.

JaneWatkinson said...

Thanks for the comment. I think we will have to buy a steel box then:)...

Ah, that is interesting. But I guess even if it is him or not, he still associates himself with these articles and so looks as though he supports what they say.His personal life also tend to support the 'laddish' attitude he seems to have when writing these types of things.

JaneWatkinson said...

(if he does write them that is)

Adam said...

Putting his name to the articles is as bad as writing them himself. Almost as if the LibDems are endorsing the views in the column. Which I hope they don't, ever.

JaneWatkinson said...

Exactly, I totally agree.